Once again, Janet Evanovich has written a fun novel that we have all grown to love. Not much new here, but who cares?
Karen
Read-alike: Savannah Blues by Mary Kay Andrews
I have to admit I have never read an entire book
about JFK. I guess it’s because I’m not
a fan of the whole Camelot thing. The
title of this book intrigued me, and it reminded me of an excerpt of one of
Kennedy’s speeches that I heard. It was
given in December 1962 to the New York Economic Club and was promoting his
proposed tax cut. The theme of JFK,Conservative, is basically found in a quotation from the first paragraph of the
penultimate chapter. “President Kennedy spent—and planned to spend—Friday, November 22, 1963, in Texas doing just what
he had done for his entire presidency and for much of his political career:
quoting the Bible, making the case for a strong military that would defend
freedom against the Communists, and promoting economic growth through a tax
cut.” (181) Ira Stoll, who has
previously written a book on patriot Sam Adams, goes through every stage of
Kennedy’s career, beginning with a speech he delivered on July 4, 1946, at
Feneuil Hall in Boston. The challenge of the book
is defining the terms “conservative” and “liberal,” as they have stood for many
things over the years. Stoll shows that
Republican presidents Eisenhower and Nixon were actually more “liberal” in their
policies regarding Communism, economic policy and social policy, while Kennedy
was more “conservative” in those areas.
As evidence, Stoll cites numerous Kennedy speeches and the many protests
by economists and peace activists. Even
his advisors were often frustrated with him, and many of them sought to change
his record after his death.
Cahill’s latest offering is the sixth installment in the
“Hinges of History” series that began in 1995.
Heretics and Heroes: How Renaissance Artists and Reformation Priests Created Our World reads like an upper-level European history lecture
class. It is definitely not for readers
unfamiliar with the major artistic, political and religious figures of the time
period. Cahill displays an amazing
breadth (if not depth) of knowledge on the topics. He often references his other books and
frequently comments that the topics treated could each have a complete book
written about them. His thesis of sorts
is that European sensibilities shifted from a Platonic/Augustianian outlook to
a more Aristotelian/Aquinine outlook.
This is reflected in the works of many contemporary artists such as
Botticello, Caravaggio, Durer and Bruegher.
Cahill analyzes pieces of Renaissance art in great detail and provides accompanying
illustrations of them. Complementing his
art history lecture is a study of the Reformation. Cahill discusses Luther, Erasmus, Zwingli and
Calvin, et al, and pits them against the various popes and church officials who
sought to stop the movement. The reader
cringes at the inherent turmoil between Catholic and Protestant, and among the
Protestants, as everyone sought to promulgate their version of the truth. Numerous tortures, beheadings and burnings are described, and it is this
gruesome reality that the artwork reflects.
Lest the reader conclude the book in a foul mood, Cahill decides to end
on a high note by profiling authors and artists (e.g. Cervantes, Shakespeare,
Donne and Rembrandt) who aren’t defined by religion.